For small specific surface area samples, such as battery materials, organic compounds, biological materials, metal powders, and abrasives with limited porosity, the static method may not provide accurate results due to the low adsorption capacity. This is especially true when comparing it to the wind-heat assist device and detector thermostat used in high-precision dynamic methods. The static method faces significant challenges in ensuring accuracy for small surface area samples because of the limitations in measuring very small volumes of gas adsorption.
For example, consider a sample with a specific surface area of 1 m²/g and a mass of 0.5 g. Under BET conditions, the amount of nitrogen adsorbed at a partial pressure range is only about 0.1 ml. However, the volume of the adsorption environment at liquid nitrogen temperature is just 0.03 ml, while the background volume of the sample tube (the volume not occupied by the sample) is approximately 3–5 ml. Accurately quantifying the sample tube volume within 0.03 ml requires a pressure sensor with an accuracy of at least 0.03%, but most imported sensors have an accuracy of only 0.1%. Even under ideal conditions, the uncertainty can reach up to 10%, which makes it difficult to achieve reliable results for small samples.
In contrast, for medium-to-large surface area samples, the static method is more practical, as the adsorption volume is larger and the error margin is easier to control. In such cases, the static method can typically achieve an accuracy of 2% or even 1%, making it a preferred choice for many applications.
However, for small surface area samples, increasing the sample weight is one way to reduce errors. Many static instruments are equipped with large-capacity sample tubes for this purpose. But this also increases the background volume, which limits the overall accuracy. Some manufacturers claim that their static methods can measure samples with a surface area as low as 0.0001 m²/g, but such claims are often exaggerated and lack real-world validation.
On the other hand, high-precision dynamic methods with wind-heat assistance, detector thermostats, and low-temperature cold traps significantly improve measurement accuracy. These systems enhance signal strength, reduce noise, and minimize external interference, allowing for more precise detection of small adsorption volumes. For instance, with a 1 m²/g sample weighing 0.5 g, the peak area and background can be measured with less than 2% error.
In summary:
1. For small specific surface area samples (below 10 m²/g), dynamic chromatography instruments with wind-heat assist and detector thermostats are recommended due to their superior sensitivity and resolution.
2. For medium-to-large surface area samples, both dynamic and static methods can provide accurate results. However, the dynamic method offers faster measurements, while the static method saves on liquid nitrogen and time through the multi-point BET approach.
3. If pore size distribution is required, a static volumetric method is generally more suitable for accurate and comprehensive analysis.
Al2O3 Aerospace Ceramics, Aerospace Ceramic Part, ceramic for aerospace
Yixing Guangming Special Ceramics Co.,Ltd , https://www.yxgmtc.com